Prediction of Noah Perfetti [883rd] vs Mathias Bourgue [515th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L W L L W L L W W L
Form
W W L W L W W W L WHead-To-Head: Perfetti 0 - 0 Bourgue
Perfetti | Stats | Bourgue |
---|---|---|
36% (4-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (15-8) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
883 | Ranking | 515 |
812 | Highest Rank | 140 |
24 | Age | 31 |
- | Plays | R |
0 | Titles | 13 |
54% (79-67) | Career Total W/L | 59% (481-330) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $143,480 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Noah Perfetti vs Mathias Bourgue Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Perfetti 0 - 0 Bourgue
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Perfetti has won 45.75% of points on their second serve, while Bourgue has won 45.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Perfetti, in recent form, has won 46.87% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bourgue has won 43.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.22% and 23.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Perfetti has saved 51.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bourgue has saved 51.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Perfetti has won 46.43% of matches played (W/L 26/ 30), with Bourgue winning 55.17% (W/L 32/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Perfetti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 71/ 57), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 8/ 10). Bourgue has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 264/ 177), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Perfetti has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.43% of matches (W/L 26/ 30), where as Bourgue has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.57% of matches (W/L 24/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Perfetti has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.63 while Bourgue has played against players with an average rank of 198.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Perfetti has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bourgue has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Perfetti has converted 42.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bourgue has converted 23.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Noah Perfetti vs Mathias Bourgue Best Odds For The Match
Noah Perfetti Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Noah Perfetti
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Noah Perfetti
Player
Umberto Giovannini
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
113)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Noah Perfetti
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Manuel Mazza
Player
Noah Perfetti
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Noah Perfetti
Player
Stefano Reitano
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Branko Djuric
Player
Noah Perfetti
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Beraldo
Player
Noah Perfetti
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Noah Perfetti
Player
Louis Wessels
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Noah Perfetti
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Mathias Bourgue Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Nikola Basic
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Loann Massard
Player
Mathias Bourgue
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Antoine Vincent
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Raphael Vaksmann
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Mikail Alimli
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Joris De Loore
Player
Mathias Bourgue
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
69 of
91)
6
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Charles Bertimon
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
13
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Hamish Stewart
Player
Mathias Bourgue
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Jacopo Bilardo
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Pierre Delage
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Perfetti vs Bourgue?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Perfetti Vs Bourgue is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54% (79/67) | Win/Loss | 59% (481/330) |
54% (179/151) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1076/806) |
52% (1560/1444) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9426/8346) |
0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
71 | Aces Total | 3464 |
0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
80 | Total Double Faults | 1505 |
1:6:44 | Average Match Time | 1:14:57 |
123 | Average Opponent Rank | 200.37 |
71% (4139/5868) | 1st Serve % | 63% (27061/42901) |
58% (2390/4139) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (18985/27061) |
47% (813/1729) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7968/15840) |
45% (308/680) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1631/4043) |
43% (2582/5958) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16485/42654) |
54% (78/145) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (472/790) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
46% (6/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (144/263) |
44% (17/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (146/261) |
85% (75/64) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (450/398) |
15% (75/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (450/51) |
21% (71/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (361/82) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mathias Bourgue
View full predicted draw for Bourgue
Other Predictions
- Loading news...